Next Article >
Vol. 2, Iss. 2, Special Section: Metacognition

The Quantification of Doubt in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Frederick Aardema1,2,3, Kieron P. O'Connor1,3, Marie-Claude Pélissier1, Marc E. Lavoie1

1 Fernand-Seguin Research Center, Montreal.

2 Concordia University, Montreal.

3 University of Montreal.

The study was supported with a Fellowship Award from the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé Québec (FRSQ) to the first author and Grant No. MOP67059 from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) to the second and fourth author.

We would also like to thank the associate editor Dr. David A. Clark and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions in the preparation of the final manuscript.

Address correspondence to Frederick Aardema, Centre de Recherche Fernand-Seguin, 7331 Hochelaga, Montréal, Québec H1N 3V2, Canada. E-mail:



Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is a debilitating psychiatric disorder characterized by high levels of pathological doubt. The current article investigates the cognitive process of doubt in OCD as the dynamic interplay between the impact of possibility and reality-based information. An experimental reasoning task was designed to measure changes in level of doubt by alternately presenting participants with possibility and reality-based information. People with OCD were hypothesized to be more affected by possibility-based information leading to higher levels of doubt. Results confirmed these expectations, and showed that as compared to nonclinical controls, those with OCD were more affected by possibility-based information. The impact of possibility-based information, and levels of doubt, related robustly to symptom severity. As expected, the relationship between the impact of possibility and symptom severity could be explained by inferential confusion, but not by any other cognitive domains, thereby confirming the convergent validity of the current experimental manipulation.

Cited by

, . (2012) Dissolving the tenacity of obsessional doubt: Implications for treatment outcome. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 43:2, 855-861
Online publication date: 1-Jun-2012.
CrossRef
2011. Bibliography: Key IBA Publications and Other References. , 321-324.
CrossRef
, , , , . (2011) Obsessive-compulsive-like reasoning makes an unlikely catastrophe more credible. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 42:3, 293-297
Online publication date: 1-Sep-2011.
CrossRef
, . (2011) Imaginative, dissociative, and schizotypal processes in obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Journal of Clinical Psychology 67:1, 74-81
Online publication date: 1-Jan-2011.
CrossRef
, , , , , . (2010) The Expanded Version of the Inferential Confusion Questionnaire: Further Development and Validation in Clinical and Non-Clinical Samples. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 32:3, 448-462
Online publication date: 1-Sep-2010.
CrossRef