To help offer the best experience possible, Guilford uses cookies on its site. By browsing here, you acknowledge our terms of use. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
You can also read Guilford's Privacy Policy.

×
Skip to main content

ALL ACCESS PASS: All Guilford journals for 30 days, just $49.95 | Click on any article to purchase 

The obscure object of desire-‘Nearly, but clearly not, like me’: Contingency preference in normal children versus children with autism

The author describes the central role of contingency detection in early socioemotional development. It has been proposed (Gergely & Watson, 1999) that infants are innately equipped with a complex perceptual mechanism, the “contingency detection module,” which functions to establish the primary representation of the bodily self as well as the later orientation toward reactive social objects. According to the “contingency switch” model, the target value of the module that is initially genetically set to preferentially explore perfectly response-contingent stimulation is “switched” at around 3 months toward a preference for less-than-perfect social contingencies. It is hypothesized that the primary cause of childhood autism is a genetic defect, due to which the normal process of switching contingency preference at around 3 months does not take place. Preliminary results from an experimental study to test this model are reported. The study contrasts the preferential reactions of normal children and children with autism to perfect versus imitative (high-but-imperfect) contingencies. The results provide support for the contingency switch hypothesis of the etiology of childhood autism.

References

  • Bahrick , L. R., & Watson, J. S. (1985). Detection of intermodal proprioceptive-visual contingency as a potential basis of self-perception in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 21, 963–973. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bailey , A., Phillips, W., & Rutter, M. (1996). Autism: Towards an integration of clinical, genetic, neurophysiological, and neurobiological perspectives. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 89–126. Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Baron-Cohen , S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  • Baron-Cohen , S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21(7), 37–46. Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Courchesne , E., Townsend, J., Askhoomoff, N. A., Yeung-Courchesne, R., Murakami, G. A., Lincoln, A., James, H. E., Saitoh, O., Haas, R. H., Schreibman, L., & Lau, L. (1994). A new finding in autism: Impairment in shifting attention. In S. H. Broman & J. Grafman (Eds.), Atypical cognitive deficits in developmental disorders: Implications for brain function (pp. 101–138). Hllsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
  • Dawson , G., & Adams, A. (1984). Imitation and social responsiveness in autistic children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 12, 209–225. Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Field , T. (1979). Differential behavioral and cardiac responses of 3-month-old infants to a mirror and peer. Infant Behavior and Development, 2, 179–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frith , U. (1989). Autism: Explaining the enigma. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Google Scholar
  • Gergely , G., Koós, O., & Watson, J. S. (in press). Contingency perception and the role of contingent parental reactivity in early socio-emotional development: Some implications for developmental psychopathology. In J. Nadel & J. Decety (Eds.), Imitation, action et intentionnalité. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Google Scholar
  • Gergely , G., Magyar, J., & Balázs, A. (1999, June). Childhood autism as “blindness” to less-than-perfect contingencies. Poster presented at the Biennial Conference of the International Society for Research in Childhood and Adolescent Psychopathology (ISRCAP), Barcelona, Spain. Google Scholar
  • Gergely , G., & Watson, J. (1996). The social biofeedback model of parental affect-mirroring. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 77, 1181–1212. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Gergely , G., & Watson, J. S. (1999). Early socio-emotional development: Contingency perception and the social-biofeedback model. In P. Rochat (Ed.), Early social cognition: Understanding others in the first months of life (pp. 101–136). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
  • Happé , F. (1993). Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition, 48, 101–119. Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Happé , F. (1994). Autism: An introduction to psychological theory. London: UCL Press. Google Scholar
  • Leekam , S., Baron-Cohen, S., Perrett, D., Milders, M., & Brown, S. (1997). Eye-direction detection: A dissociation between geometric and joint attention skills in autism. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15, 77–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leslie , A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation : The origins of “theory of mind.” Psychological Review, 94, 412–426. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leslie , A. M. (1994). ToMM, ToBy, and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificity. In L. Hirschfeld, & S. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 119–148). New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Lewis , M., Alessandri, S. M., & Sullivan, M. W. (1990). Violation of expectancy, loss of control, and anger expressions in young infants. Developmental Psychology, 26(5), 745–751. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis , M., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1979). Social cognition and the acquisition of self. New York: Plenum. Google Scholar
  • Magyar , J., & Gergely, G. (1998, April). The obscure object of desire: “Nearly, but clearly not, like me”: Perceiving self-generated contingencies in normal and autistic children. Poster presentation at the International Conference on Infancy Studies, Atlanta, GA. Google Scholar
  • Meltzoff , A. N. (1990). Foundations for developing a concept of self: The role of imitation in relating self to other and the value of social mirroring, social modeling, and self practice in infancy. In D. Cicchetti & M. Beeghly (Eds.), The self in transition: Infancy to childhood (pp. 139–164). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  • Meltzoff , A. N., & Gopnik, A. (1993). The role of imitation in understanding persons and developing a theory of mind. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism (pp. 335–365). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Nadel , J. (in press). The functional use of imitation in preverbal infants and nonverbal children with autism. In A. Meltzoff & W. Prinz (Eds.), The imitative mind. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Nadel , J., Croue, S., Mattlinger, M. J., Canet, P., Hudelot, C., Lecuyer, C., & Martini, M. (2000). Do children with autism have expectancies about the social behaviour of unfamiliar people? A pilot study using the Still Face paradigm. Autism, 4(2), 133–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ozonoff , S., Pennington, B. F., & Rogers, S. J. (1991). Executive function deficits in high-functioning autistic individuals: Relationship to theory of mind. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 32, 1081–1105. Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Papousek H., & Papousek, M. (1974). Mirror-image and self-recognition in young human infants: A new method of experimental analysis. Developmental Psychobiology, 7, 149–157. Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Piaget , J. (1952). Origins of intelligence. New York: Norton. (Original work published 1936) Google Scholar
  • Rochat , P., & Morgan, R. (1995). Spatial determinants in the perception of self-produced leg movements in 3- to 5-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 31, 626–636. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Russell , J. (Ed.). (1997). Autism as an executive disorder. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Schmuckler , M. A. (1996). Visual-proprioceptive intermodal perception in infancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 19, 221–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watson , J. S. (1972). Smiling, cooing, and “the game.” Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 18, 323–339. Google Scholar
  • Watson , J. S. (1979). Perception of contingency as a determinant of social responsiveness. In E. Thoman (Ed.), The origins of social responsiveness (pp. 33–64). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
  • Watson , J. S. (1984). Bases of causal inference in infancy: Time, space and sensory relations. In L. P. Lipsitt & C. Rovee-Collier (Eds.), Advances in infancy research (Vol. 3, pp. 152–165). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Google Scholar
  • Watson , J. S. (1985). Contingency perception in early social development. In T. M. Field & N. A. Fox (Eds.), Social perception in infants (pp. 157–176). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Google Scholar
  • Watson , J. S. (1994). Detection of self: The perfect algorithm. In S. T. Parker, R. W. Mitchell, & M. L. Boccia (Eds.), Self-awareness in animals and humans: Developmental perspectives (pp. 131–148). New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Watson , J. S. (2001). Contingency perception and misperception in infancy: Some potential implications for attachment. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 65, 296–320. LinkGoogle Scholar