To help offer the best experience possible, Guilford uses cookies on its site. By browsing here, you acknowledge our terms of use. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
You can also read Guilford's Privacy Policy.

×
Skip to main content

ALL ACCESS PASS: All Guilford journals for 30 days, just $49.95 | Click on any article to purchase 

Thin-Ideal Internalization and Social Comparison Tendency as Moderators of Media Models' Impact on Women's Body-Focused Anxiety

Exposure to thin media models has a negative effect on women's body image, and the current study extends previous research by examining the relative impact and interrelation of two moderators: (a) individual differences in women's internalization of the thin ideal, and (b) tendency to make social comparisons with media models. Body-focused anxiety of adult professional women (n = 150) was examined after they had been exposed to one of three types of images: thin models, average-size models, or no models (baseline control). Regression analyses confirmed that thin-ideal internalization and tendency toward appearance–related social comparisons act as moderators of media effects, but internalization is a more proximal and specific predictor of women's anxiety than more general social comparison. Negative reactions to thin images are conditional on internalization only, whereas high internalization undermines the positive effects of exposure to average-size models when it combines with strong habitual social comparison. Implications for methodology, future research, and intervention are discussed.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual ofmental disorders, 4th edition text revision (DSM–IV–TR). Washington, DC: Author. Google Scholar
  • Banana Republic. (2001). Size guide http://www.bananarepublic.com Google Scholar
  • Baron , R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • British Medical Association. (2000). BMA takes part in body image summit. http://web.bma.org.uk/pressrel.nsf Google Scholar
  • Cattarin , J., Williams, R., Thomas, C. M., & Thompson, J. K. (2000). The impact of televised images of thinness and attractiveness on body image: The role of social comparison. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 220–239. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clay, D., Vignoles, V. L., & Dittmar, H. (in press). Body–image and self–esteem among adolescent females: Testing the influence of sociocultural factors. Journal of Research on Adolescence. Google Scholar
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
  • Cusumano , D. L. & Thompson, J. K. (1997). Body image and body shape ideals in magazines: Exposure, awareness, and internalization. Sex Roles, 37, 701–721. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Debenhams (2001). Size guide http://www.debenhams.com Google Scholar
  • Dittmar , H., & Howard, S. (2004). Professional hazards? The impact of model's body size on advertising effectiveness and women's body–focused anxiety in professions that do and do not emphasize the cultural ideal of thinness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Groesz , L. M., Levine, M. P., & Murnen, S. K. (2002). The effect of experimental presentation of thin media images on body satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 31, 1-16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halliwell , E., & Dittmar, H. (2004). Does size matter? The impact of model's body size on women's body–focused anxiety and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 105–132. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Heinberg , L. J., & Thompson, J. K. (1995). Body image and televised images of thinness and attractiveness: A controlled laboratory investigation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 14, 324–338. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Heinberg , L. J., Thompson, J. K., & Stormer, S. (1995). Development and validation of the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 17, 81–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Irving , L.M. (1990). Mirror images: Effects of the beauty standard on the self– and body–esteem of women exhibiting varying levels of bulimic symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 230–242. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Irving , L. M. (2001). Media exposure and disordered eating: Introduction to the special section. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 20, 259–269. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R., & Wan, C. W. (1990). Interaction effects in multiple regression. London: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Jones , D. C. (2001). Social comparison and body image: Attractiveness comparisons to models and peers among adolescent girls and boys. Sex Roles, 45, 645–664. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Major, B., Testa, M., & Bylsma, W. H. (1991). Responses to upward and downward social comparisons: The impact of esteem–relevance and perceived control. In J. Suls & T.A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (p. 237–260). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
  • Mills , J. S., Polivy, J., Herman, P., & Tiggemann, M. (2002). Effects of exposure to thin media images: Evidence of self–enhancement among restrained eaters. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1687–1699. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reed , D. L., Thomson, J. K, Brannick, M. T., & Sacco, W. P. (1991). Development and validation of the Physical Appearance State and Trait Anxiety Scale. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 5, 323–332. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richins , M. L. (1991). Social comparison and the idealized images of advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 71–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spitzer , B. L, Henderson, K. A., & Zivian, M. T. (1999). Gender differences in population versus media body sizes: A comparison over four decades. Sex Roles, 40, 545–565. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stice , E., Schupak–Neuberg, E., Shaw, H. E., & Stein, R. I. (1994). Relation of media exposure to eating disorder symptomatology: An examination of mediating mechanisms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 836–840. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stice , E., Spangler, D., & Agras, W. S. (2001). Exposure to media–portrayed thin–ideal images adversely affects vulnerable girls: A longitudinal experiment. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 2, 270–288. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stormer , S. M., & Thompson, K. J. (1996). Explanations of body image disturbance: A test of maturational status, negative verbal commentary, social comparison, and sociocultural hypothesis. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 19, 193–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Striegel–Moore , R., Silberstein, L. R., & Rodin, J. (1986). Toward an understanding of risk factors for bulimia. American Psychologist, 41, 246–263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strowman, S. R. (1999). Comparison to Models Survey. In K. J. Thompson, L. J. Heinberg, M. Altabe, & S. Tantleff–Dunn. Exacting beauty: Theory, assessment and treatment of body image disturbance (pp. 144). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Google Scholar
  • Thompson, J. K., Heinberg, L. J., Altabe, M., & Tantleff–Dunn, S. (1999). Exacting beauty: Theory, assessment and treatment of body image disturbance. Washington DC: American Psychological Association. Google Scholar
  • Thompson , J. K., & Stice, E. (2001). Thin–ideal internalization: Mounting evidence for a new risk factor for body-image disturbance and eating pathology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 181–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wood , J. (1989). Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 231–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar