To help offer the best experience possible, Guilford uses cookies on its site. By browsing here, you acknowledge our terms of use. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
You can also read Guilford's Privacy Policy.

×
Skip to main content

ALL ACCESS PASS: All Guilford journals for 30 days, just $49.95 | Click on any article to purchase 

Search
Search
Quick Search anywhere
Advanced Search
Skip main navigation

Assessing Self-Definition and Relatedness in Level of Personality Functioning

Published Online:December 2021https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2021_35_516

Abstract

The two polarities model (TPM) of personality organizes psychological assessment and psychotherapy and connects to personality disorder diagnosis using the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD). The authors developed scales assessing the TPM from an existing self-report measure for level of personality functioning (LPF), a core component of the AMPD. Iterative content analyses of the LPF measure yielded scales for Autonomy and Communion corresponding to dimensions of the TPM. The scales were refined via internal consistency analyses using a measure of psychological attachment and studied in development and validation samples. Associations with relevant external criteria were explored in a series of multiple regressions. The new content-based LPF scales were illustrated with a case vignette. Although the new Autonomy/Communion scales await further validation prior to clinical use, initial evidence suggests that they may bridge the nomological nets of the TPM and AMPD and potentially offer clinical utility in assessment and treatment planning.

REFERENCES

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Bach B., , Maples-Keller J. L., , Bo S., , & Simonsen E. (2016). The alternative DSM-5 personality disorder traits criterion: A comparative examination of three self-report forms in a Danish population. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 7, 124–135. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Bateman A., , & Fonagy P. (2009). Randomized controlled trial of outpatient mentalization-based treatment versus structured clinical management for borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 166, 1355–1364. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Bateman A., , & Fonagy P. (2010). Mentalization based treatment for borderline personality disorder. World Psychiatry, 9(1), 11–15. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Bakan D. (1966). The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally. Google Scholar
  • Barlow D. H., , Allen L. B., , & Choate M. L. (2004). Common principles for treating emotional disorders. Clinician's Research Digest, 22(11), 1. Google Scholar
  • Bartholomew K., , & Horowitz L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226–244. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Beck A. T., , Epstein N., , Harrison R. P., , & Emery G. (1983). Development of the Sociotropy-Autonomy Scale: A measure of personality factors in psychopathology. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. Google Scholar
  • Bender D. S. (2005). The therapeutic alliance in the treatment of personality disorders. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 11, 73–87. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Bender D. S., , Morey L. C., , & Skodol A. E. (2011). Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM-5, part I: A review of theory and methods. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 332–346. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Bernecker S. L., , Levy K. N., , & Ellison W. D. (2014). A meta-analysis of the relation between patient adult attachment style and the working alliance. Psychotherapy Research, 24(1), 12–24. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Blais M. A., , Lenderking W. R., , Baer L., , deLorell A., , Peets K., , Leahy L., , & Burns C. (1999). Development and initial validation of a brief mental health outcome measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 73, 359–373. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Blatt S. J. (2008). Polarities of experience: Relatedness and self-definition in personality development, psychopathology, and the therapeutic process. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Google Scholar
  • Blatt S. J., , & Luyten P. (2009). A structural-developmental psychodynamic approach to psychopathology: Two polarities of experience across the life span. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 793–814. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Blatt S. J., , & Shahar G. (2004). Psychoanalysis— With whom, for what, and how? Comparisons with psychotherapy. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 52, 393–447. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Blatt S. J., , Zuroff D. C., , Hawley L. L., , & Auerbach J. S. (2010). Predictors of sustained therapeutic change. Psychotherapy Research, 20(1), 37–54. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Bo S., , Sharp C., , Fonagy P., , & Kongerslev M. (2017). Hypermentalizing, attachment, and epistemic trust in adolescent BPD: Clinical illustrations. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 8, 172–182. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Bornstein R. F., , & Huprich S. K. (2006). Construct validity of the Relationship Profile Test: Three-year retest reliability and links with core personality traits, object relations, and interpersonal problems. Journal of Personality Assessment, 86, 162–171. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Bornstein R. F., , Languirand M. A., , Geiselman K. J., , Creighton J. A., , West M. A., , Gallagher H. A., , & Eisenhart E. A. (2003). Construct validity of the Relationship Profile Test: A self-report measure of dependency-detachment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 64–74. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Bornstein R. F., , Porcerelli J. H., , Huprich S. K., , & Markova T. (2009). Construct validity of the Relationship Profile Test: Correlates of overdependence, detachment, and healthy dependency in low income urban women seeking medical services. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 537–544. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Bowlby J. (1977). The making and breaking of affectional bonds: II. Some principles of psychotherapy: The Fiftieth Maudsley Lecture (expanded version). British Journal of Psychiatry, 130, 421–431. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Clarkin J. F., , Cain N., , & Livesley W. J. (2015). An integrated approach to treatment of patients with personality disorders. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 25(1), 3–12. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Crowell J. A., , Treboux D., , & Waters E. (1999). The Adult Attachment Interview and the Relationship Questionnaire: Relations to reports of mothers and partners. Personal Relationships, 6(1), 1–18. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Fonagy P., , & Allison E. (2014). The role of mentalizing and epistemic trust in the therapeutic relationship. Psychotherapy, 51, 372–380. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Fonagy P., , Luyten P., , & Allison E. (2015). Epistemic petrification and the restoration of epistemic trust: A new conceptualization of borderline personality disorder and its psychosocial treatment. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29, 575–609. Link, Google Scholar
  • Fossati A., , Krueger R. F., , Markon K. E., , Borroni S., , & Maffei C. (2013). Reliability and validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) predicting DSM-IV personality disorders and psychopathy in community-dwelling Italian adults. Assessment, 20, 689–708. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Fossati A., , Krueger R. F., , Markon K. E., , Borroni S., , Maffei C., , & Somma A. (2015). The DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders from the perspective of adult attachment: A study in community-dwelling adults. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 203, 252–258. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Garcia D. J., , Waugh M. H., , Skadberg R. M., , Crittenden E. B., , Finn M. T. M., , Schmidt M. R., , & Kurdziel-Adams G. (2020). Deconstructing Criterion A of the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000431 Google Scholar
  • Haggerty G., , Blake M., , Naraine M., , Siefert C., , & Blais M. A. (2010). Construct validity of the Schwartz Outcome Scale-10: Comparisons to interpersonal distress, adult attachment, alexithymia, the five-factor model, romantic relationship length and ratings of childhood memories. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 17, 44–50. Medline, Google Scholar
  • Hopwood C. J. (2018). A framework for treating DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorder features. Personality and Mental Health, 12, 107–125. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Hopwood C. J., , Good E. W., , & Morey L. C. (2018). Validity of the DSM-5 Levels of Personality Functioning Scale-Self Report. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100, 650–659. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Hopwood C. J., , Mulay A. L., , & Waugh M. H. (Eds.). (2019). The DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders: Integrating multiple paradigms of personality assessment. New York, NY: Routledge. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Hopwood C. J., , Pincus A. L., , DeMoor R. M., , & Koonce E. A. (2008). Psychometric characteristics of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-Short Circumplex (IIP-SC) with college students. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 615–618. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Horowitz L. M., , Alden L. E., , Wiggins J. S., , & Pincus A. L. (2000). IIP-64/IIP-32 professional manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation. Google Scholar
  • Huprich S. K., , Nelson S. M., , Meehan K. B., , Siefert C. J., , Haggerty G., , Sexton J., , … Baade L. (2018). Introduction of the DSM-5 Levels of Personality Functioning Questionnaire. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9, 553–563. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Kernberg O. F. (1975). A systems approach to priority setting of interventions in groups. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 25, 251–275. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Kohut H. (1979). The two analyses of Mr Z. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 60, 3–27. Medline, Google Scholar
  • Kohut H., , & Wolf E. S. (1978). The disorders of the self and their treatment: An outline. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 59, 413–425. Google Scholar
  • Krueger R. F. (2019). Criterion B of the AMPD and the interpersonal, multivariate, and empirical paradigms of personality assessment. In Hopwood C. J., , Mulay A. L., , & Waugh M. H. (Eds.), The DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders: Integrating multiple paradigms of personality assessment (pp. 60–76). New York, NY: Routledge. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Krueger R. F., , Derringer J., , Markon K. E., , Watson D., , & Skodol A. E. (2013). The Personality Inventory for DSM-5—Brief Form (PID5-BF)—adult. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. Google Scholar
  • Lambert M. J., , & Barley D. E. (2001). Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 38, 357–361. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Lawshe C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28, 563–575. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Leary T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality: A functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation. New York, NY: Blackwell Publishing. Google Scholar
  • Lewis K. C., , Meehan K. B., , Cain N. M., , Wong P. S., , Clemence A. J., , Stevens J., , & Tillman J. G. (2021). Quality of internalized object representations and suicidality in individuals with anaclitic and introjective personality styles. Journal of Personality Disorders, 35, 145–160. Abstract, Google Scholar
  • Lingiardi V., , McWilliams N., , & Muzi L. (2017). The contribution of Sidney Blatt's two-polarities model to the Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 20, 12–18. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Loevinger J. (1957). Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Psychological Reports, 3, 635–694. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Luyten P., , & Blatt S. J. (2013). Interpersonal relatedness and self-definition in normal and disrupted personality development: Retrospect and prospect. American Psychologist, 68, 172–183. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Luyten P., , Campbell C., , Allison E., , & Fonagy P. (2020). The mentalizing approach to psychopathology: State of the art and future directions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 16, 297–325. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Luyten P., , Lowyck B., , & Blatt S. J. (2017). Mechanisms of change through the lens of two-polarities models of personality development: State of the art and new directions. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 37, 179–190. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • McAdams D. P. (1995). What do we know when we know a person? Journal of Personality, 63, 365–396. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • McAdams D. P. (2015). The art and science of personality development. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Google Scholar
  • McAdams D. P., , & Pals J. L. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204–217. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Meehan K. B., , Siefert C., , Sexton J., , & Huprich S. K. (2019). Expanding the role of levels of personality functioning in personality disorder taxonomy: Commentary on “Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP.” Journal of Personality Assessment, 101, 367–373. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Milinkovic M. S., , & Tiliopoulos N. (2020). A systematic review of the clinical utility of the DSM-5 section III alternative model of personality disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 11, 377–397. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Morey L. C. (2007). The Personality Assessment Inventory professional manual (2nd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc. (Original work published 1991) Google Scholar
  • Morey L. C. (2017). Development and initial evaluation of a self-report form of the DSM-5 Level of Personality Functioning Scale. Psychological Assessment, 29, 1302–1308. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Mulay A. L., , Cain N. M., , Waugh M. H., , Hopwood C. J., , Adler J. M., , Garcia D. J., , … Skadberg R. (2018). Personality constructs and paradigms in the alternative DSM-5 model of personality disorder. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100, 593–602. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Mulay A. L., , Waugh M. H., , Fillauer J. P., , Bender D. S., , Bram A., , Cain N. M., , … Keeley J. W. (2019). Borderline personality disorder diagnosis in a new key. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, 6(1), 1–16. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Pincus A. L. (2018). An interpersonal perspective on Criterion A of the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders. Current Opinion in Psychology, 21, 11–17. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Pincus A. L., , & Lukowitsky M. R. (2010). Pathological narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 421–446. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Roche M. J., , Jacobson N. C., , & Phillips J. J. (2018). Expanding the validity of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale observer report and self-report versions across psychodynamic and interpersonal paradigms. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100, 571–580. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Rodriguez-Seijas C., , Ruggero C., , Eaton N. R., , & Krueger R. F. (2019). The DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders and clinical treatment: A review. Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry, 6, 284–298. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Rogers C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. In Koch S. (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (pp. 184–256). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
  • Rogers C. R. (1975). Empathic: An unappreciated way of being. Counseling Psychologist, 5, 2–10. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Ronningstam E. (2012). Alliance building and narcissistic personality disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68, 943–953. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Ronningstam E. (2014). Beyond the diagnostic traits: A collaborative exploratory diagnostic process for dimensions and underpinnings of narcissistic personality disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5, 434–438. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Ronningstam E. (2017). Intersect between self-esteem and emotion regulation in narcissistic personality disorder—Implications for alliance building and treatment. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, 4(1), 1–13. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Rossi G., , Van den Broeck J., , Dierckx E., , Segal D. L., , & van Alphen S. P. J. (2014). Personality assessment among older adults: The value of personality questionnaires unraveled. Aging & Mental Health, 18, 936–940. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Rost F., , Luyten P., , & Fonagy P. (2018). The Anaclitic-Introjective Depression Assessment: Development and preliminary validity of an observer-rated measure. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 25, 195–209. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Safran J., , & Kraus J. (2014). Alliance ruptures, impasses, and enactments: A relational perspective. Psychotherapy, 51, 381–387. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Sharp C. (2020). Adolescent personality pathology and the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders: Self development as nexus. Psychopathology, 53(3–4), 198–204. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Shedler J., , & Westen D. (2007). The Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP): Making personality diagnosis clinically meaningful. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89, 41–55. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Siefert C. J., , Sexton J., , Meehan K., , Nelson S., , Haggerty G., , Dauphin B., , & Huprich S. (2020). Development of a Short Form for the DSM-5 Levels of Personality Functioning Questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102, 516–526. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Sleep C. E., , Lynam D. R., , Widiger T. A., , Crowe M. L., , & Miller J. D. (2019). An evaluation of DSM-5 Section III personality disorder Criterion A (impairment) in accounting for psychopathology. Psychological Assessment, 31, 1181–1191. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Tanzilli A., , Muzi L., , Ronningstam E., , & Lingiardi V. (2017). Countertransference when working with narcissistic personality disorder: An empirical investigation. Psychotherapy, 54, 184–194. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Waugh M. H. (2019). Clinical utility and application of the AMPD. In Hopwood C. J., , Mulay A. L., , & Waugh M. H. (Eds.), The DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders: Integrating multiple paradigms of personality assessment (pp. 96–140). New York, NY: Routledge. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Waugh M. H., , Hopwood C. J., , Krueger R. F., , Morey L. C., , Pincus A. L., , & Wright A. G. (2017). Psychological assessment with the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders: Tradition and innovation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 48, 79–89. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Waugh M. H., , McClain C. M., , Mariotti E. C., , Mulay A. L., , DeVore E. N., , Lenger K. A., , … Beevers L. G. (2021). Comparative content analysis of self-report scales for level of personality functioning. Journal of Personality Assessment, 103(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2019.1705464 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Werbart A., , & Levander S. (2016). Fostering change in personality configurations: Anaclitic and introjective patients in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 33, 217–242. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Widiger T. A., , & Costa P. T. (2012). Integrating normal and abnormal personality structure: The five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 80, 1471–1506. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Wiggins J. S. (1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. In Cicchetti D., & Grove W. M. (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology: Essays in honor of Paul E. Meehl: Vol. 1. Matters of public interest; Vol. 2. Personality and psychopathology (pp. 89–113). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Google Scholar
  • Wiggins J. S. (2003). Paradigms of personality assessment. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Google Scholar
  • Wright A. G., , Pincus A. L., , Hopwood C. J., , Thomas K. M., , Markon K. E., , & Krueger R. F. (2012). An interpersonal analysis of pathological personality traits in DSM-5. Assessment, 19, 263–275. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Wright A. G., , Pincus A. L., , Thomas K. M., , Hopwood C. J., , Markon K. E., , & Krueger R. F. (2013). Conceptions of narcissism and the DSM-5 pathological personality traits. Assessment, 20, 339–352. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
  • Yalch M. M. (2019). Psychodynamic underpinnings of the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 37, 219–231. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Zettl M., , Volkert J., , Vögele C., , Herpertz S. C., , Kubera K. M., , & Taubner S. (2020). Mentalization and criterion A of the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders: Results from a clinical and nonclinical sample. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 11, 191–201. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Zimmermann J., , Kerber A., , Rek K., , Hopwood C. J., , & Krueger R. F. (2019). A brief but comprehensive review of research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders. Current Psychiatry Reports, 21, 92. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
Previous article
Next article