Candidate Preference, Membership Group, and Estimates of Voting Behavior
Abstract
People who differed in candidate preference and group membership were asked to estimate the voting behavior of nine categories of people within the U.S. electorate. The false-consensus hypothesis was supported in six of the nine instances. When both preference and membership were independent variables, a significant interaction occurred in five of six analyses. The estimates of both members and nonmembers supported the false-consensus (assimilation) tendency, but this tendency was stronger for members.

