To help offer the best experience possible, Guilford uses cookies on its site. By browsing here, you acknowledge our terms of use. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
You can also read Guilford's Privacy Policy.

×
Skip to main content
Search
Search
Quick Search anywhere
Advanced Search
Skip main navigation

Easy to Make, Hard to Revise: Updating Spontaneous Trait Inferences in the Presence of Trait-Inconsistent Information

Published Online:December 2020https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2020.38.6.571

Abstract

Previous research has shown that perceivers spontaneously form trait inferences from others' behaviors received at a single point in time. The present work examined the persistence of spontaneous trait inferences (STIs) in the presence of trait-inconsistent information about others. We hypothesized that STIs should be resistant to change over time and in the presence of new trait-inconsistent information due to perceivers forming and storing multiple STIs independently in memory. Consistently, Experiments 1a and 1b showed that initial STIs were not affected by new trait-inconsistent information. Experiments 2 and 3 revealed that STIs were persistent over 48 hours. Two experiments also tested memory reconsolidation as a possible mechanism of updating first impressions. While STIs were not substantially affected, spontaneous goal inferences (SGIs) were elevated among those with a better explicit memory of behaviors after learning trait-inconsistent information following a memory reactivation procedure. Implications of these findings on impression formation and updating processes are discussed.

REFERENCES

  • Aarts H., , Gollwitzer P. M., , & Hassin R. R. (2004). Goal contagion: Perceiving is for pursuing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(1), 23–37. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Agren T. (2014). Human reconsolidation: A reactivation and update. Brain Research Bulletin, 105, 70–82. Google Scholar
  • Alberini C. M., , & LeDoux J. E. (2013). Memory reconsolidation. Current Biology, 23(17), R746–R750. Google Scholar
  • Alves H., , Koch A., , & Unkelbach C. (2017). Why good is more alike than bad: Processing implications. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(2), 69–79. Google Scholar
  • Anderson M. C., , Bjork E. L., , & Bjork R. A. (2000). Retrieval-induced forgetting: Evidence for a recall-specific mechanism. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(3), 522–530. Google Scholar
  • Anderson N. H., , & Barrios A. A. (1961). Primacy effects in personality impression formation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(2), 346–350. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Asch S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41(3), 258–290. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Bargh J. A., , & Thein R. D. (1985). Individual construct accessibility, person memory, and the recall-judgment link: The case of information overload. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(5), 1129–1146. Google Scholar
  • Balcetis E. (2020). Clearer, Closer, Better: How Successful People See the World. New York: Ballantine Books. Google Scholar
  • Bassili J. N. (1989). Trait encoding in behavior identification and dispositional inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15(3), 285–296. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Baumeister R. F., , Bratslavsky E., , Finkenauer C., , & Vohs K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Bjork R. A., , & Bjork E. L. (1992) A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In Healy A. F., , Kosslyn S. M., , & R M. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in Honor of William K. Estes (vol. 2; pp. 35–67). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
  • Boucher K. L., , & Rydell R. J. (2012). Impact of negation salience and cognitive resources on negation during attitude formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(10), 1329–1342. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Brambilla M., , Carraro L., , Castelli L., , & Sacchi S. (2019). Changing impressions: Moral character dominates impression updating. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 82, 64–73. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Brannon S. M., , & Gawronski B. (2017). A second chance for first impressions? Exploring the context-(in)dependent updating of implicit evaluations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(3), 275–283. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Bruner J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64(2), 123–152. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Campbell J. I., , & Thompson V. A. (2012). MorePower 6.0 for ANOVA with relational confidence intervals and Bayesian analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 1255–1265. Google Scholar
  • Carlston D. E., , & Skowronski J. J. (1994). Savings in the relearning of trait information as evidence for spontaneous inference generation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 840–856. Google Scholar
  • Carlston D. E., , Skowronski J. J., , & Sparks C. (1995). Savings in relearning: II. On the formation of behavior-based trait associations and inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(3), 420–436. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Chan J. C. K., , & LaPaglia J. A. (2013). Impairing existing declarative memory in humans by disrupting reconsolidation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(23), 9309–9313. Google Scholar
  • Cone J., , & Ferguson M. J. (2015). He did what? The role of diagnosticity in revising implicit evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(1), 37–57. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Cone J., , Flaharty K., , & Ferguson M. J. (2019). Believability of evidence matters for correcting social impressions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(20), 9802–9807. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Cone J., , Mann T. C., , Ferguson M. J. (2017). Changing our implicit minds: How, when, and why implicit evaluations can be rapidly revised. Advances in Social Psychology, 56, 131–199. Google Scholar
  • Crawford M. T., , Skowronski J. J., , Stiff C., , & Scherer C. R. (2007). Interfering with inferential, but not associative, processes underlying spontaneous trait inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(5), 677–690. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • De Keersmaecker J., , & Roets A. (2017). “Fake news”: Incorrect, but hard to correct. The role of cognitive ability on the impact of false information on social impressions. Intelligence, 65, 107–110. Google Scholar
  • Detre G. J., , Natarajan A., , Gershman S. J., , & Norman K. A. (2013). Moderate levels of activation lead to forgetting in the think/no-think paradigm. Neuropsychologia, 51(12), 2371–2388. Google Scholar
  • Fazio L. K., , & Marsh E. J. (2009). Surprising feedback improves later memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(1), 88–92. Google Scholar
  • FeldmanHall O., , & Shenhav A. (2019). Resolving uncertainty in a social world. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(5), 426–435. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Fiske S. T. (2012). Managing ambivalent prejudices: Smart-but-cold and warm-but-dumb stereotypes. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 639(1), 33–48. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Gawronski B., , Rydell R. J., , Vervliet B., , & De Houwer J. (2010). Generalization versus contextualization in automatic evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(4), 683–701. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Gilbert D. T. (1998). Ordinary personology. Handbook of Social Psychology, 2, 89–150. Google Scholar
  • Gollwitzer P. M., , & Moskowitz G. (1996). Goal effects on thought and behavior. In Higgins E. T., & Kruglanski A. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 361–399). New York: Guilford. Google Scholar
  • Goodwin G. P., , Piazza J., , & Rozin P. (2014). Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(1), 148–168. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Gregg A. P., , Seibt B., , & Banaji M. R. (2006). Easier done than undone: Asymmetry in the malleability of implicit preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(1), 1–20. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Halamish V., , & Bjork R. A. (2011). When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(4), 801–812. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Hamilton D. L., , Katz L. B., , & Leirer V. O. (1980). Cognitive representation of personality impressions: Organizational processes in first impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1050–1063. Google Scholar
  • Hastie R., , & Kumar P. A. (1979). Person memory: Personality traits as organizing principles in memory for behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 25–38. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Heider F., , & Simmel M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 243–259. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Higgins E. T., , & Bargh J. A. (1987). Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 38(1), 369–425. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Hogarth R. M., , & Einhorn H. J. (1992). Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology, 24(1), 1–55. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Hupbach A., , Gomez R., , Hardt O., , & Nadel L. (2007). Reconsolidation of episodic memories: A subtle reminder triggers integration of new information. Learning and Memory, 14, 47–53. Google Scholar
  • Hupbach A., , Gomez R., , & Nadel L. (2009). Episodic memory reconsolidation: Updating or source confusion? Memory, 17, 502–510. Google Scholar
  • Hupbach A., , Gomez R., , & Nadel L. (2015). Memory reconsolidation (invited chapter). In Barense M., , Addis D. R., , & Duarte A. (Eds.), The cognitive neuroscience of human memory (pp. 244–264). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar
  • Hupbach A., , Hardt O., , Gomez R., , & Nadel L. (2008). The dynamics of memory: Context-dependent updating. Learning & Memory, 15(8), 574–579. Google Scholar
  • Jerónimo R., , Garcia-Marques L., , Ferreira M. B., , & Macrae C. N. (2015). When expectancies harm comprehension: Encoding flexibility in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 110–119. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Johnson I. R., , Kopp B. M., , & Petty R. E. (2018). Just say no! (and mean it): Meaningful negation as a tool to modify automatic racial attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(1), 88–110. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Jones E. E., , & Davis K. E. (1965). A theory of correspondent inferences: From acts to dispositions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 219–266. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Kruglanski A. W., , & Freund T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(5), 448–468. Google Scholar
  • Lupfer M. B., , Clark L. F., , & Hutcherson H. W. (1990). Impact of context on spontaneous trait and situational attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(2), 239–249. Google Scholar
  • Ma D. S., , Correll J., , & Wittenbrink B. (2015). The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1122–1135. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Ma N., , Vandekerckhove M., , Baetens K., , Van Overwalle F., , Seurinck R., , & Fias W. (2012). Inconsistencies in spontaneous and intentional trait inferences. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(8), 937–950. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Ma N., , Vandekerckhove M., , Van Overwalle F., , Seurinck R., , & Fias W. (2011). Spontaneous and intentional trait inferences recruit a common mentalizing network to a different degree: Spontaneous inferences activate only its core areas. Social Neuroscience, 6(2), 123–138. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Mann T. C., , Cone J., , Heggeseth B., , & Ferguson M. J. (2019). Updating implicit impressions: New evidence on intentionality and the affect misattribution procedure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(3), 349–374. Google Scholar
  • Mann T. C., , & Ferguson M. J. (2015). Can we undo our first impressions? The role of reinterpretation in reversing implicit evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(6), 823–849. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Mann T. C., , & Ferguson M. J. (2017). Reversing implicit first impressions through reinterpretation after a two-day delay. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 122–127. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • McCarthy R. J., , & Skowronski J. J. (2011). What will Phil do next? Spontaneously inferred traits influence predictions of behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(2), 321–332. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • McCarthy R. J., , Wells B. M., , Skowronski J. J., , & Carlston D. E. (2018). Multiple behavior descriptions affect the acquisitions of STI and STT. Psychological Reports, 121(4), 615–634. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Mende-Siedlecki P. (2018). Changing our minds: The neural bases of dynamic impression updating. Current Opinion in Psychology, 24, 72–76. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Mende-Siedlecki P., , & Todorov A. (2016). Neural dissociations between meaningful and mere inconsistency in impression updating. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(9), 1489–1500. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Moskowitz G. B., , & Olcaysoy Okten I. (2016). Spontaneous goal inference (SGI). Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(1), 64–80. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Nader K., , Schafe G. E., , & LeDoux J. E. (2000). Fear memories require protein synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval. Nature, 406, 722–726. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Nordstrom C. R., , Hall R. J., , & Bartels L. K. (1998). First impressions versus good impressions: The effect of self-regulation on interview evaluations. Journal of Psychology, 132(5), 477–491. Google Scholar
  • Olcaysoy Okten I., , & Moskowitz G. B. (2020). Spontaneous goal versus spontaneous trait inferences: How ideology shapes attributions and explanations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(1), 177–188. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Olcaysoy Okten I., , Schneid E. D., , & Moskowitz G. B. (2019). On the updating of spontaneous impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(1), 1–25. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Ortony A., , Turner T. J., , & Antos S. J. (1983). A puzzle about affect and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(4), 725–729. Google Scholar
  • Park B. (1989). Trait attributes as on-line organizers in person impressions. In Bassilli J. (Ed.), On-line cognition in person perception (pp. 39–60). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
  • Petty R. E., & Briñol P. (2010). Attitude structure and change: Implications for implicit measures. In Gawronski B., & Payne B. K. (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 335–352). New York: Guilford. Google Scholar
  • Petty R. E., , Briñol P., , & DeMarree K. G. (2007). The meta-cognitive model (MCM) of attitudes: Implications for attitude measurement, change, and strength. Social Cognition, 25(5), 657–686. Link, Google Scholar
  • Petty R. E., , Tormala Z. L., , Briñol P., , & Jarvis W. B. G. (2006). Implicit ambivalence from attitude change: An exploration of the PAST model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(1), 21–41. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Potts R., , & Shanks D. R. (2012). Can testing immunize memories against interference? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(6), 1780–1785. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Rapp D. N., , & Kendeou P. (2007). Revising what readers know: Updating text representations during narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 35(8), 2019–2032. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Robinson-Riegler G. L., , & Winton W. M. (1996). The role of conscious recollection in recognition of affective material: Evidence for positive-negative asymmetry. Journal of General Psychology, 123(2), 93–104. Google Scholar
  • Rothbart M., , Evans M., , & Fulero S. (1979). Recall for confirming events: Memory processes and the maintenance of social stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15(4), 343–355. Google Scholar
  • Rydell R. J., , & McConnell A. R. (2006). Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change: A systems of reasoning analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 995–1008. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Rydell R. J., , McConnell A. R., , Mackie D. M., , & Strain L. M. (2006). Of two minds forming and changing valence-inconsistent implicit and explicit attitudes. Psychological Science, 17(11), 954–958. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Rydell R. J., , McConnell A. R., , Strain L. M., , Claypool H. M., , & Hugenberg K. (2007). Implicit and explicit evaluations respond differently to increasing amounts of counterattitudinal information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(5), 867–878. Google Scholar
  • Satpute A. B., , & Lieberman M. D. (2006). Integrating automatic and controlled processes into neurocognitive models of social cognition. Brain Research, 1079(1), 86–97. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Schiller D., , & Phelps E. A. (2011). Does reconsolidation occur in humans? Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 1–12. Google Scholar
  • Schneid E. D., , Carlston D. E., , & Skowronski J. J. (2015). Spontaneous evaluative inferences and their relationship to spontaneous trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(5), 681–696. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Schwabe L., & Wolf O.T. (2009). New episodic learning interferes with the reconsolidation of autobiographical memory. Plos One, 4, 1–4. Google Scholar
  • Schwabe L., & Wolf O.T. (2010). Stress impairs the reconsolidation of autobiographical memories. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 94, 153–157. Google Scholar
  • Scully I. D., , Napper L. E., , & Hupbach A. (2017). Does reactivation trigger episodic memory change? A meta-analysis. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 142, 99–107. Google Scholar
  • Sherman J. W., , Lee A. Y., , Bessenoff G. R., , & Frost L. A. (1998). Stereotype efficiency reconsidered: Encoding flexibility under cognitive load. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 589–606. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Skowronski J. J., , & Carlston D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 131–142. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Smith E. R., , & DeCoster J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 108–131. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Smith E. R., , & Miller F. D. (1983). Mediation among attributional inferences and comprehension processes: Initial findings and a general method. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(3), 492–505. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • St. Jacques P. L., , & Schacter D. L. (2013). Modifying memory: Selectively enhancing and updating personal memories for a museum tour by reactivating them. Psychological Science, 24(4), 537–543. Google Scholar
  • Szpunar K. K., , McDermott K. B., , & Roediger III H. L. (2008). Testing during study insulates against the buildup of proactive interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(6), 1392–1399. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Thompson M. M., , Naccarato M. E., , Parker K. C. H., , & Moskowitz G. B. (2001). The personal need for structure and personal fear of invalidity measures: Historical perspectives, current applications, and future directions. In Moskowitz G. B. (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (pp. 19–39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar
  • Todorov A., , Gobbini M. I., , Evans K. K., , & Haxby J. V. (2007). Spontaneous retrieval of affective person knowledge in face perception. Neuropsychologia, 45(1), 163–173. Google Scholar
  • Todorov A., , & Uleman J. S. (2002). Spontaneous trait inferences are bound to actors’ faces: Evidence from a false recognition paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1051–1065. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Todorov A., , & Uleman J. S. (2004). The person reference process in spontaneous trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(4), 482–493. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Tversky A., , & Kahneman D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Uleman J. S. (1999). Spontaneous versus intentional inferences in impression formation. In Chaiken S., & Trope Y. (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 141–160). New York: Guilford. Google Scholar
  • Uleman J. S., , Blader S. L., , & Todorov A. (2005). Implicit impressions. In Hassin R. R., , Uleman J. S., , & Bargh J. A. (Eds.). The new unconscious (pp. 362–392). New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Uleman J. S., , Hon A., , Roman R. J., , & Moskowitz G. B. (1996). On-line evidence for spontaneous trait inferences at encoding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(4), 377–394. Google Scholar
  • Uleman J. S., , & Moskowitz G. B. (1994). Unintended effects of goals on unintended inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(3), 490–501. Google Scholar
  • Uleman J. S., , Newman L. S., , & Moskowitz G. B. (1996). People as flexible interpreters: Evidence and issues from spontaneous trait inference. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 211–280. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Uleman J. S., , Rim S., , Saribay S. A., , & Kressel L. M. (2012). Controversies, questions, and prospects for spontaneous social inferences. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(9), 657–673. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Van Dessel P., , & De Houwer J. (2019). Hypnotic suggestions can induce rapid change in implicit attitudes. Psychological Science, 30(9), 1362–1370. Google Scholar
  • Wells B. M., , Skowronski J. J., , Crawford M. T., , Scherer C. R., , & Carlston D. E. (2011). Inference making and linking both require thinking: Spontaneous trait inference and spontaneous trait transference both rely on working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1116–1126. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Wichert S., , Wolf O. T., , & Schwabe L. (2013). Updating of episodic memories depends on the strength of new learning after memory reactivation. Behavioral Neuroscience, 127(3), 331–338. Google Scholar
  • Wigboldus D. H., , Dijksterhuis A., , & van Knippenberg A. (2003). When stereotypes get in the way: Stereotypes obstruct stereotype-inconsistent trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 470–484. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Willis J., , & Todorov A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17(7), 592–598. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Wilson T. D., , Lindsey S., , & Schooler T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107(1), 101–126. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Winter L., , & Uleman J. S. (1984). When are social judgments made? Evidence for the spontaneousness of trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 237–252. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Winter L., , Uleman J. S., , & Cunniff C. (1985). How automatic are social judgments? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(4), 904–917. Google Scholar
  • Wyer N. A. (2010). You never get a second chance to make a first (implicit) impression: The role of elaboration in the formation and revision of implicit impressions. Social Cognition, 28(1), 1–19. Link, Google Scholar
  • Wyer N. A. (2016). Easier done than undone. … by some of the people, some of the time: The role of elaboration in explicit and implicit group preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 77–85. Crossref, Google Scholar
Previous article
Next article