To help offer the best experience possible, Guilford uses cookies on its site. By browsing here, you acknowledge our terms of use. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
You can also read Guilford's Privacy Policy.

×
Skip to main content

Everything you need with Guilford's 30-day ALL ACCESS pass, just $49.95 | Click on any article to purchase  

Search
Search
Quick Search anywhere
Advanced Search
Skip main navigation

Religious Affiliation and Conceptions of the Moral Domain

Published Online:February 2021https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2021.39.1.139

Abstract

What is the relationship between religious affiliation and conceptions of the moral domain? Putting aside the question of whether people from different religions agree about how to answer moral questions, here we investigate a more fundamental question: How much disagreement is there across religions about which issues count as moral in the first place? That is, do people from different religions conceptualize the scope of morality differently? Using a new methodology to map out how individuals conceive of the moral domain, we find dramatic differences among adherents of different religions. Mormon and Muslim participants moralized their religious norms, while Jewish participants did not. Hindu participants in our sample did not seem to make a moral/non-moral distinction of the same kind. These results suggest a profound relationship between religious affiliation and conceptions of the scope of the moral domain.

REFERENCES

  • Arnold T. W. (1913). The preaching of Islam: A history of the propagation of the Muslim faith. New York: Constable. Google Scholar
  • Berniunas R. (2014). Delineating the moral domain in moral psychology. Problemos, Supplement, 90–101. Google Scholar
  • Buchtel E. E., , Guan Y., , Peng Q., , Su Y., , Sang B., , Chen S. X., , & Bond M. H. (2015). Immorality East and West: Are immoral behaviors especially harmful, or especially uncivilized? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(10), 1382–1394. Google Scholar
  • Church T., , Katigbak M. S., , Reyes J. A. S., , & Jensen S. M. (1998). Language and organization of Filipino emotion concepts: Comparing emotion concepts and dimensions across cultures. Cognition & Emotion, 12(1), 63–92. Google Scholar
  • Cohen A. B., , Malka A., , Rozin P., , & Cherfas L. (2006). Religion and unforgivable offenses. Journal of Personality, 74(1), 85–118. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Cohen A. B., , & Rozin P. (2001). Religion and the morality of mentality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 697–710. Google Scholar
  • Dranseika V., , Berniunas R., , & Silius V. (2018). Immorality and Bu Daode, unculturedness and Bu Wenming. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, 2(1–2), 71–84. Google Scholar
  • Everitt B. S., , Gourlay A. J., , & Kendell R. E. (1971). An attempt at validation of traditional psychiatric syndromes by cluster analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 119, 399–412. Google Scholar
  • Everitt B. S., , Landau S., , Leese M., , & Stahl D. (2011). Cluster analysis. Chichester: Wiley. Google Scholar
  • Fessler D. M. T., , Barrett H. C., , Kanovsky M., , Stich S., , Holbrook C., , Henrich J., , Bolyanatz A. H., , Gervais M. M., , Gurven M., , Kushnick G., , Pisor A. C., , von Rueden C., , & Laurence S. (2015) Moral parochialism and contextual contingency across seven societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1813), 20150907. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Flood G. (2008). The Blackwell companion to Hinduism. Oxford: Wiley. Google Scholar
  • Fontaine J. R., , Poortinga Y. H., , Setiadi B., , & Markam S. S. (2002). Cognitive structure of emotion terms in Indonesia and The Netherlands. Cognition & Emotion, 16(1), 61–86. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Graham J., , & Haidt J. (2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 140–150. Google Scholar
  • Graham J., , Haidt J., , Koleva S., , Motyl M., , Iyer R., , Wojcik S., , & Ditto P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55–130. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Graham J., , Haidt J., , & Nosek B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Haidt J., , & Graham J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98–116 Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Haidt J., , & Joseph C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, 133(4), 55–66. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Haidt J., , Koller S., , & Dias M. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 613–628. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Huebner B., , Lee J. J., , & Hauser M. D. (2010). The moral-conventional distinction in mature moral competence. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10(1), 1–26. Google Scholar
  • Human Relations Area Files Database. Available online at http://ehrafworldcultures.yale.edu/ehrafe/ Google Scholar
  • Kelly D., , Stich S., , Haley K. J., , Eng S. J., , & Fessler D. M. (2007). Harm, affect, and the moral/conventional distinction. Mind & Language, 22(2), 117–131. Google Scholar
  • Kendell R., , & Jablensky A. (2003). Distinguishing between the validity and utility of psychiatric diagnoses. American journal of psychiatry, 160(1), 4–12. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Killen M., , & Smetana J. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of moral development. Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press. Google Scholar
  • Machery E. (2012). Delineating the moral domain. Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, 7(1), 6. Google Scholar
  • Machery E. (2018). Morality: A historical invention. In Graham J., and Gray K. (Eds.), Atlas of moral psychology (pp. 259–265). New York: Guilford. Google Scholar
  • Machery E., , & Stich S. (2013). You can't have it both ways: What is the relation between morality and fairness? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(1), 95. Google Scholar
  • McKay R., , & Whitehouse H. (2015). Religion and morality. Psychological Bulletin, 141(2), 447. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • McKenzie J., , & Jensen L. A. (2017). Charting the moral life courses: A theory of moral development in US evangelical and mainline Protestant cultures. Culture & Psychology, 23(4), 433–460. Google Scholar
  • Miller J. G. (2001). Culture and moral development. In Matsumoto D. (Ed.), The handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 151–169). New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Murdock G. P. (1981). Atlas of world cultures. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Google Scholar
  • Norenzayan A. (2014). Does religion make people moral? Behaviour, 151(2–3), 365–384. Google Scholar
  • Nucci L. (1981). Conceptions of personal issues: A domain distinct from moral or societal concepts. Child Development, 52, 114–121. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Nucci L. P. (1985). Children's conceptions of morality, societal convention, and religious prescription. Moral dilemmas: Philosophical and psychological issues in the development of moral reasoning, 137-174. Google Scholar
  • Nucci L., , & Turiel E. (1993). God's word, religious rules, and their relation to Christian and Jewish children's concepts of morality. Child Development, 64(5), 1475–1491. Google Scholar
  • Obeid N., , Argo N., , & Ginges J. (2017). How moral perceptions influence intergroup tolerance: Evidence from Lebanon, Morocco, and the United States. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(3), 381–391. Google Scholar
  • Paykel E. S. (1971). Classification of depressed patients: A cluster analysis derived grouping. British Journal of Psychiatry, 118, 275–288. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Prinz J. (2006). The emotional basis of moral judgments. Philosophical Explorations, 9(1), 29–43. Google Scholar
  • Schwartz S. H., , & Huismans S. (1995). Value priorities and religiosity in four Western religions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 88–107. Google Scholar
  • Shepherd G., , & Shepherd G. (1996). Membership growth, church activity, and missionary recruitment. Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, 29(1), 33–57. Google Scholar
  • Shweder R. A., , Mahapatra M., , & Miller J. G. (1987). Culture and moral development. In Kagan J., & Lamb S. (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children (pp. 1–83). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  • Skitka L. J. (2010). The psychology of moral conviction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(4), 267–281. Google Scholar
  • Skitka L. J., , Bauman C. W., , & Sargis E. G. (2005). Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(8), 95–917. Google Scholar
  • Smetana J. (1981). Preschool children's conceptions of moral and social rules. Child Development, 52, 1333–1336. Google Scholar
  • Sneath P. H., , & Sokal R. R. (1973). Numerical taxonomy. The principles and practice of numerical classification. San Francisco: Freeman. Google Scholar
  • Sousa P., , Holbrook C., , & Piazza J. (2009). The morality of harm. Cognition, 113(1), 80–92. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Sousa P., , & Piazza J. (2014). Harmful transgressions qua moral transgressions: A deflationary view. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(1), 99–128. Google Scholar
  • Srinivasan M., , Kaplan E., , & Dahl A. (2018). Reasoning about the scope of religious norms: Evidence from Hindu and Muslim children in India. Child Development, 90(6), e783–e802. Google Scholar
  • Stich S. (2017). The moral domain. In Gray K., and Graham J. (Eds.), Atlas of moral psychology (pp. 547–555). New York: Guilford. Google Scholar
  • Stich S. (2018). The quest for the boundaries of morality. In Jones K., , Timmons M., and Zimmerman A. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of moral epistemology (pp. 15–37). New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
  • Stich S., , Fessler D., , & Kelly D. (2009). On the morality of harm: A response to Sousa, Holbrook and Piazza. Cognition, 113, 93–97. Google Scholar
  • Tangney J. P., , Miller R. S., , Flicker L., , & Barlow D. H. (1996). Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1256. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Thiessen E. J. (2011). The ethics of evangelism: A philosophical defense of proselytizing and persuasion. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press. Google Scholar
  • Turiel E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Vainio A. (2011). Religious conviction, morality and social convention among Finnish adolescents. Journal of Moral Education, 40(1), 73–87. Google Scholar
  • Wallace G., , & Walker A. (Eds.). (1970). The definition of morality. London: Methuen. Google Scholar
Previous article
Next article