Understanding Impression Updating Through Behavior Predictions
Published Online:June 2024https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2024.42.3.198
Abstract
People largely preserve spontaneously drawn trait inferences from others' behaviors in their memory, even when contrary information is present. However, we suggest that updating could be manifested in future predictions about others. Experiment 1 replicated previous work, showing no updating in the memory of initially inferred traits upon learning trait-inconsistent new information. Experiments 2–4 tested whether people’s reliance on the initially implied traits in their future predictions changed as an indicator of updating. Participants aligned their predictions with the initially implied traits when the new information was neutral. However, after learning trait-inconsistent (vs. neutral) new information, they made weaker future predictions consistent with the initially implied traits and stronger predictions consistent with alternative (inconsistent) traits, revealing updating. The patterns were similar across continuous and categorical prediction measures (Experiment 3) and generalized to other valence-matching impressions (Experiment 4). The present work reveals nuances that extend our understanding of impression updating and suggests a utility in combining memory measures of impression formation with behavior predictions.
References
- (1961). Primacy effects in personality impression formation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(2), 346–350. Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41(3), 258–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055756 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1989). Trait encoding in behavior identification and dispositional inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15(3), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167289153001 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024). Spontaneous trait inferences from behavior: A systematic meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 50(1), 78–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221100336 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015). He did what? The role of diagnosticity in revising implicit evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(1), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000014 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 1–19. Google Scholar
- (2001). Spontaneous inferences from pictorially presented behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(11), 1533–1546. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012711013 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005). Priming trait inferences through pictures and moving pictures: The impact of open and closed mindsets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.229 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016). More than meets the eye: Split-second social perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(5), 362–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.003 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022). The secret life of spontaneous trait inferences: Emergence, puzzles, and accomplishments. In Balcetis E., & Moskowitz G. B. (Eds.), The handbook of impression formation (pp. 116–137). Routledge. Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011). When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(4), 801–812. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023219 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1958). Perceiving the other person. In Tagiuri R., & Petrullo L. (Eds.), Person perception and interpersonal behavior (pp. 22–26). Stanford University Press. Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1992). Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology, 24(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90002-J Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022). Directed forgetting in the social domain: Forgetting behaviors but not inferred traits. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 11(4), 522–533. https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000012 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000). Maintaining cultural stereotypes in the serial reproduction of narratives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 594–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616720026700 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1972). Attribution in social interaction. In Jones E. E., , Kanouse D. E., , Kelley H. H., , Nisbett R. E., , Valins S., , & Weiner B. (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 1–26). General Learning Press. Google Scholar
- (2021). Spontaneous state inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(4), 774–791. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000232 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1421–1436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1421 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015). The Chicago Face Database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1122–1135. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0532-5 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015). Can we undo our first impressions? The role of reinterpretation in reversing implicit evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(6), 823–849. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000021 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017). Reversing implicit first impressions through reinterpretation after a two-day delay. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.06.004 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1986). Set/reset: Use and disuse of concepts in impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.493 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990). Assimilation and contrast as a function of people's willingness and ability to expend effort in forming an impression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.27 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011). What will Phil do next? Spontaneously inferred traits influence predictions of behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(2), 321–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.10.015 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993). Individual differences in social categorization: The influence of personal need for structure on spontaneous trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.132 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016). Spontaneous goal inference (SGI). Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12232 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1992). Spontaneous trait inferences as self-generated primes: Implications for conscious social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(5), 728–738. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.5.728 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996). Trait impressions as heuristics for predicting future behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(4), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296224006 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020). Easy to make, hard to revise: Updating spontaneous trait inferences in the presence of trait-inconsistent information. Social Cognition, 38(6), 571–625. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2020.38.6.571 Link, Google Scholar
- (2019). On the updating of spontaneous impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000156 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012). Can testing immunize memories against interference? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(6), 1780–1785. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028218 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015). Spontaneous evaluative inferences and their relationship to spontaneous trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(5), 681–696. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039118 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008). Averaging and summation: Positivity and choice as a function of the number and affective intensity of life events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.03.003 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1989). Audience composition and felt anxiety: Impact averaging and summation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1001_6 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998). Stereotype efficiency reconsidered: Encoding flexibility under cognitive load. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 589–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.589 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005). Prejudice and stereotype maintenance processes: Attention, attribution, and individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 607–622. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.607 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008). Spontaneous impressions derived from observations of behavior: What a long, strange trip it's been (and it's not over yet). In Ambady N., & Skowronski J. J. (Eds.), First impressions (pp. 313–333). Guilford Publications. Google Scholar
- . (2008). Testing during study insulates against the buildup of proactive interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(6), 1392–1399. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013082 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001). The personal need for structure and personal fear of invalidity measures. In Moskowitz G. B. (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (pp. 19–40). Erlbaum. Google Scholar
- (2002). Spontaneous trait inferences are bound to actors’ faces: Evidence from a false recognition paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1051–1065. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1051 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996). People as flexible interpreters: Evidence and issues from spontaneous trait inference. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 211–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60239-7 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: The role of naive theories in corrections for perceived bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.1.36 Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010). You never get a second chance to make a first (implicit) impression: The role of elaboration in the formation and revision of implicit impressions. Social Cognition, 28, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2010.28.1.1 Link, Google Scholar
