The Cognitive-Motivational Roots of Conservatives' Desire for the Past
Abstract
As a political ideology, conservatism is primarily focused on maintaining and restoring past society. This aspect is so central that conservatives’ support for policies is increased simply by framing them as a return to the past. Until now, the underlying process of this temporal framing effect is unclear. Drawing on theories of conservatism as motivated social cognition, four preregistered studies (Ntotal = 2,405) test the hypothesis that it results from conservatives’ epistemic and existential beliefs about the past. Studies 1 and 2 demonstrate that American conservatives’ preference for past-focused political communication is blocked if the past is perceived to be inconsistent with these beliefs. Studies 3 and 4 (a representative UK sample replication) find that the effect is mediated by epistemic and existential beliefs about the past. This research theoretically integrates the earlier-established conservative temporal framing effect into the wider literature of conservatism as motivated social cognition.
References
- 1950). The authoritarian personality. Harpers. Google Scholar (
- 2016). Past-focused environmental comparisons promote proenvironmental outcomes for conservatives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(52), 1495314957. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1610834113 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- Ball T., , & Bellamy R. (Eds.). (2003). The Cambridge history of twentieth-century political thought. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521563543 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 2005). Rejected and alone. The Psychologist, 18, 732–735. Google Scholar (
- 2001). Framing through temporal metaphor: The “bridges” of Bob Dole and Bill Clinton in their 1996 acceptance addresses. Communication Studies, 52(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970109388541 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr057 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2022). Remarks by President Biden on the continued battle for the soul of the nation. The White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2022/09/01/remarks-by-president-bidenon-the-continued-battle-for-the-soul-of-the-nation/ Google Scholar (
- 2006). Conservative shift among high-exposure survivors of the September 11th terrorist attacks. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28(4), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2804_4 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2004). Personalizing politics: A congruency model of political preference. American Psychologist, 59(7), 581–594. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.7.581 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2019). Online panels in social science research: Expanding sampling methods beyond Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 51(5), 2022–2038. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01273-7 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2015). Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology? Research & Politics, 2(4), 2053168015622072. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015622072 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2021). Partisan pandemic: How partisanship and public health concerns affect individuals’ social mobility during COVID-19. Science Advances, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd7204 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2021, July 21). Those on ideological right favor fewer COVID-19 restrictions in most advanced economies. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/07/30/those-on-ideological-right-favor-fewer-covid-19-restrictions-in-most-advanced-economies/ Google Scholar (
- 2023). Revisiting the rigidity-of-the-right hypothesis: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 124(5), 1025–1052. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000446 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2009). Are all conservatives alike? A study of the psychological correlates of cultural and economic conservatism. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 143(5), 449–463. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRL.143.5.449-463 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2020). Partisan differences in physical distancing are linked to health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1186–1197. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00977-7 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2003). Psychological motives and political orientation— The left, the right, and the rigid: Comment on Jost et al. (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 376–382. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.376 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2022). Seeking stability: Consumer motivations for communal nostalgia. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 32(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1237 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2001). A relational approach to cognition: Shared experience and relationship affirmation in social cognition. In Moskowitz G. B. (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (pp. 3–17). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar (
- 1996). Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In Higgins E. T., & Sorrentino R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: The interpersonal context (3rd ed., pp. 28–84). Guilford Press. Google Scholar (
- 2022). Evaluating CloudResearch's Approved Group as a solution for problematic data quality on MTurk. Behavior Research Methods, 55, 3953–3964. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01999-x Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press. Google Scholar (
- 2006). The Meaning Maintenance Model: On the coherence of social motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(2), 88–110. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_1 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2012). Not all ideologies are created equal: Epistemic, existential, and relational needs predict system-justifying attitudes. Social Cognition, 30(6), 669–688. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2012.30.6.669 Link, Google Scholar (
- 2023). The impact of perceived partisanship on climate policy support: A conceptual replication and extension of the temporal framing effect. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 86, 101972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.101972 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 1957). Conservatism as an ideology. American Political Science Review, 51(2), 454–473. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952202 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2008). Mapping moral motives: Approach, avoidance, and political orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1091–1099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.11.003 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 1936). Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their applications to some educational problems. Statistical Research Memoirs, 1, 57–93. Google Scholar (
- 2017). Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology. Political Psychology, 38(2), 167–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12407 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2012). Political ideology as motivated social cognition: Behavioral and neuroscientific evidence. Motivation and Emotion, 36(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9260-7 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2004). The ideological animal: A system justification view. In Greenberg J., , Koole S. L., , & Pyszczynski T. (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 263–283). Guilford Press. Google Scholar (
- 2003a). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2003b). Exceptions that prove the rule—Using a theory of motivated social cognition to account for ideological incongruities and political anomalies: Reply to Greenberg and Jonas (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 383393. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.383 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2008). Shared reality, system justification, and the relational basis of ideological beliefs. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00056.x Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2007). Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(7), 989–1007. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207301028 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00070.x Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2017). The politics of fear: Is there an ideological asymmetry in existential motivation? Social Cognition, 35(4), 324353. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.4.324 Link, Google Scholar (
- 2010). Fighting the future with the past: Nostalgia buffers existential threat. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(3), 309–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.02.006 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2012). The ideological toolbox: Ideologies as tools of motivated social cognition. In Fiske S. T., & Macrae C. N. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social cognition (pp. 495–515). SAGE Publications. Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2021). Do past-focused environmental messages promote pro-environmentalism to conservatives? A pre-registered replication. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 73, 101547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101547 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 1953). The conservative mind: From Burke to Eliot. Avon Books. Google Scholar (
- 2016). Terror management and politics: Comparing and integrating the “conservative shift” and “political worldview defense” hypotheses. In Harvell L. A., & Nisbett G. S. (Eds.), Denying death: An interdisciplinary approach to terror management theory (pp. 28–46). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315641393-3 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2013). To belong is to matter: Sense of belonging enhances meaning in life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(11), 1418–1427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213499186 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2018). Past-focused temporal communication overcomes conservatives’ resistance to liberal political ideas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(4), 599–619. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000121 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2020). Make America gracious again: Collective nostalgia can increase and decrease support for right-wing populist rhetoric. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(5), 943–954. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2673 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2013). Writing autobiographical narratives increases political conservatism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 684–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.008 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2023). Does framing climate change policies to fit with epistemic needs for predictability reduce conservatives’ opposition? Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 23(3), 571–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12362 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2024). Political-ideological differences in cultural pessimism and nostalgia reflect people's evaluation of their nation's historical developments. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 15(3), 370–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506231173735 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2010). Terror management and personality: Variations in the psychological defense against the awareness of mortality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(10), 906–917. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00305.x Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2013). Construct validity of the Need to Belong Scale: Mapping the nomological network. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(6), 610–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.819511 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2005). A history of Western political thought. Routledge. Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2021). The dark side of inspirational pasts: An investigation of nostalgia in right-wing populist communication. Media and Communication, 9(2), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i2.3803 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2002). The death-anxiety buffering function of close relationships: Exploring the effects of separation reminders on death-thought accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(3), 287–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202286001 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 1986). Time's arrows: Scientific attitudes toward time. Simon and Schuster. Google Scholar (
- 1997). Conservatism: An anthology of social and political thought from David Hume to the present. Princeton University Press. Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2009). Conservative shift among liberals and conservatives following 9/11/01. Social Justice Research, 22(2-3), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-009-0098-z Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 124(1), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2018). The role of close relationships in terror management: A systematic review and research agenda. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(4), 307–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317753505 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2017). Beyond threat and uncertainty: The underpinnings of conservatism. Social Cognition, 35(4), 313323. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.4.313 Link, Google Scholar (
- 2006). Death and black diamonds: Meaning, mortality, and the Meaning Maintenance Model. Psychological Inquiry, 17(4), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400701366985 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2015). The politics of time: Conservatives differentially reference the past and liberals differentially reference the future. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(7), 391–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12306 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2011). Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the Need for Closure Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(1), 90–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.004 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2008). A blast from the past: The terror management function of nostalgia. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(1), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.11.001 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2011). The past makes the present meaningful: Nostalgia as an existential resource. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(3), 638–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024292 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2016). Nostalgia as an existential intervention: Using the past to secure meaning in the present and the future. In Russo-Netzer P., , Schulenberg S. E., , & Batthyany A. (Eds.), Clinical perspectives on meaning (pp. 343–362). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41397-6_17 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2012). The power of the past: Nostalgia as a meaning-making resource. Memory, 20(5), 452–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2012.677452 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2017). Determining power and sample size for simple and complex mediation models. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617715068 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2024). Highlighting the old in the “new normal”: Appealing to conservatives’ focus on the past decreases opposition to COVID-19 measures. Social Psychology, 55(2), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000544 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2012). An attachment perspective on coping with existential concerns. In Shaver P. R., & Mikulincer M. (Eds.), Meaning, mortality, and choice: The social psychology of existential concerns. (pp. 291–307). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13748-016 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2021). Both Republicans and Democrats prioritize family, but they differ over other sources of meaning in life. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/11/22/both-republicans-and-democrats-prioritize-family-but-they-differ-over-other-sources-of-meaning-in-life/ Google Scholar (
- 2019). Longing for the good old days of ‘our country’: Understanding the triggers, functions and consequences of national nostalgia. In Mukherjee S., & Salter P. S. (Eds.), History and collective memory from the margins: A global perspective (pp. 53–77). Nova Science Publishers. Google Scholar (
- 2018). Regaining in-group continuity in times of anxiety about the group's future: A study on the role of collective nostalgia across 27 countries. Social Psychology, 49(6), 311–329. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000350 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2021). Longing for the “good old days” of our country: National nostalgia as a new master-frame of populist radical right parties. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 5(2), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.78 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2021). The effects of a temporal framing manipulation on environmentalism: A replication and extension. PLoS One, 16(2), e0246058. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246058 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2021). Pro-diversity intervention improves Poles’ intergoup attitudes by increasing collective nostalgia for more open Polish society. Affective Science, 2(4), 397–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-021-00031-3 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2022). Leveraging knowledge about historical diversity: A meta-analysis of findings from the school of dialogue intergroup intervention. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 28(3), 314–326. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000626 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2021). Different pasts for different political folk: Political orientation predicts collective nostalgia content. Frontiers in Political Science, 3, 633688. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.633688 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 2006). Nostalgia: Content, triggers, functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91 (5), 975–993. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.975 Crossref, Google Scholar (
- 1973). The psychology of conservatism. Academic Press. Google Scholar (
- 2014). Nostalgia: Sanctuary of meaning. University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. http://hdl.handle.net/11299/189216 Google Scholar (
- 2015). The modern perception of time and acceleration of the pace of life. Sociological Research, 54(3), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10610154.2015.1098297 Crossref, Google Scholar (